The system
From signed contract to first day: how UN entry on duty (EOD) actually works
9 min read
Applications
9 min read · updated 6 August 2026
A conditional offer and a letter of appointment are not the same document, and the gap between them is where most of the real uncertainty in a UN or IO hiring process actually sits. The conditional offer is a promise pending checks; the letter of appointment is the instrument that creates the employment relationship itself, once reference, medical and security clearance have all come back satisfactory. This guide covers what the letter actually contains, what a candidate can and can’t negotiate before signing it, and what happens if you decline.
The letter of appointment is the formal, signed document that establishes a staff member’s legal relationship with the organization under its Staff Regulations and Rules — distinct from the earlier verbal or written conditional offer, which is only an indication of intent. It is issued after clearances are complete, not before, which is why organizations are careful to describe everything that comes earlier as conditional: an offer can still be withdrawn up to this point if a clearance comes back unsatisfactory, while the signed letter itself is what both sides are actually bound by.
Beyond the basic fact of appointment, the letter sets out the terms that govern the post: the grade and step (which determines base salary on the ICSC salary scale), the duty station, the type of appointment — temporary, fixed-term or continuing — the functional title and organizational unit, the effective date (which starts the probationary period covered in the performance appraisal guide), and a reference to the Staff Regulations and Rules that govern the appointment generally rather than restating them in full. None of this is usually a surprise by the time the letter arrives — it should match what was discussed at offer stage — but it is the first point where the terms are legally fixed rather than indicative.
Organizations sequence it this way deliberately: issuing a binding appointment before medical, security and reference clearance is complete would commit the organization to terms it might need to withdraw, which is worse for both sides than a clearly labelled conditional period. The wait between an oral or written conditional offer and the actual letter is exactly the clearance window described in the reference and clearance checks guide — commonly four to ten weeks depending on the duty station and whether formal security vetting applies — and it is normal for that gap to feel long when the offer itself already felt final.
Declining a specific offer is not, on its own, treated as a black mark on a candidate’s standing with an organization — people decline for entirely ordinary reasons, and recruiters generally understand that. What it does typically end is that specific selection: if the process also generated a roster placement alongside the offer, a decline can affect that placement too, depending on the organization’s own e-recruitment rules, so it is worth asking directly what declining does to your status before you do it rather than assuming. A genuinely difficult personal or family reason for postponing an agreed start date is usually workable through direct conversation with HR — it is a much smaller ask than declining outright, and organizations that have already invested a full selection process in a candidate generally prefer to accommodate it.
A free changemaker profile keeps every stage of an application — offer conversations included — in one place, so nothing agreed verbally gets lost by the time the actual paperwork arrives.
Related guides
The system
9 min read
The system
8 min read
Every vacancy in the system is on the board, and a page that carries your evidence takes minutes to start.